The article by Oortwijn, Jansen, and Baltussen (OJB) is much more important than it appears because, in the absence of any good general theory of “evidence-informed deliberative processes” (EDP) and limited evidence of how they might be shaped and work in institutionalising health technology assessment (HTA), the best approach seems to be to accumulate the experience of a variety of countries, preferably systematically, from which some general principles might subsequently be inferred. This comment reinforces their arguments and provides a further example
Objectives Deliberative processes for health technology assessment (HTA) are intended to facilitate ...
Calls for evidence-based policy often fail to recognise the fundamentally political nature of policy...
Objectives Deliberative processes for health technology assessment (HTA) are intended to facilitate ...
Background: Evidence-informed deliberative processes (EDPs) were recently introduced to guid...
There are at least two reasons why health technology assessment (HTA) agencies need to ...
Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) can help countries attain and sustain universal health coverage (U...
Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) can help countries attain and sustain universal health coverage (U...
Daniels, Porteny and Urrutia et al make a good case for the idea that that public decisions ought to...
This paper seeks to test 12 conjectures about the predicted use of deliberative processes by applyin...
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the potential feasibility and utility of evidence-informed d...
This dissertation aims to make four contributions to knowledge. First, unlike other fields (e.g. sci...
This paper seeks to test 12 conjectures about the predicted use of deliberative processes by applyin...
Includes abstracts in French, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, and RussianEvidence briefs and deliberative ...
Contains fulltext : 214090.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access
Evidence-informed decisions are conjectured to be better than un-evidenced ones. Evidence is classif...
Objectives Deliberative processes for health technology assessment (HTA) are intended to facilitate ...
Calls for evidence-based policy often fail to recognise the fundamentally political nature of policy...
Objectives Deliberative processes for health technology assessment (HTA) are intended to facilitate ...
Background: Evidence-informed deliberative processes (EDPs) were recently introduced to guid...
There are at least two reasons why health technology assessment (HTA) agencies need to ...
Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) can help countries attain and sustain universal health coverage (U...
Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) can help countries attain and sustain universal health coverage (U...
Daniels, Porteny and Urrutia et al make a good case for the idea that that public decisions ought to...
This paper seeks to test 12 conjectures about the predicted use of deliberative processes by applyin...
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the potential feasibility and utility of evidence-informed d...
This dissertation aims to make four contributions to knowledge. First, unlike other fields (e.g. sci...
This paper seeks to test 12 conjectures about the predicted use of deliberative processes by applyin...
Includes abstracts in French, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, and RussianEvidence briefs and deliberative ...
Contains fulltext : 214090.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access
Evidence-informed decisions are conjectured to be better than un-evidenced ones. Evidence is classif...
Objectives Deliberative processes for health technology assessment (HTA) are intended to facilitate ...
Calls for evidence-based policy often fail to recognise the fundamentally political nature of policy...
Objectives Deliberative processes for health technology assessment (HTA) are intended to facilitate ...